3 Aug 2026 · 6:30 PM IST
Ladies and gentlemen, good day and welcome to the Torrent Power Limited Q1 FY27 earnings conference call.
As a reminder, all participant lines will be in the listen only mode, and there will be an opportunity for you to ask questions after the presentation concludes. Should you need assistance during the conference call, please signal an operator by pressing star and then zero on your touchtone phone. Please note that this conference is being recorded. I now hand the conference over to Mr. Saurabh Mashruwala, Executive Director and CFO. Thank you and over to you, sir.
Thank you.
Good evening to all of you and thank you for joining earning cause of torrent power of Q1 FY27. We'll first take you the performance of the quarter thereafter we welcome the question and answer.
Next, we'll explain the performance of the company at PPT level first, and then we'll take you through the tax expenses separately.
Reported PBT for the quarter stood at ₹925 crores as compared to ₹985 crores in the corresponding quarter of last year, a reduction of ₹60 crores.
PBT for the corresponding quarter of the last year includes a non-recurring loss of ₹59 crores on account of non-case adjustment due to foreign currency fluctuations.
Adjusted over is one of PPT for the quarter stood at 925 crores as compared to 1 1044 crores. The comparable quarter of last year, a reduction of 119 crores on adjusted basis.
Tax express is during the quarter has increased by 28% as compared to 25% for the corresponding quarter of the last year. The increase is mainly on account of completion of tax already paid earlier availed under section 80IA for some of the units.
Business factors contributing to the performance are as follows. First, contribution from the thermal generation business remains resilient despite elevated gas prices arising from ongoing geopolitical tension in Middle East and increase in OEM expenses.
Adjustable non-recurring items in the corresponding quarter of the previous year, the business performance was lower by 123 crores primarily on account of three factors. First, despite elevated gas price during the quarter, the company maintained healthy operating margins in its merchant power operations. However, the gains from the merchant sales and LNG trading were lower by 87 crores.
During the quarter, we have undertaken upgrade exercise to our gas based plant to improve the plant flexibility and availability resulting into the increase in O&M expenses by 51 crores. Benefit of these are being demonstrated during the quarter whereby we are we were able to realize better margins on merchant power sales.
While some of the upgrades are implemented, implemented, others are being progressively rolled out in our gas gas unit, which will help us improve our margin realization going forward.
This will also help us manage the evolving operating environment, which has significantly changed recently on back of increased renewable energy penetration, requiring our unit to operate more frequently in a cyclical mode, respond to varying demand patterns.
These measures are expected to support higher availability, improve operating operational reliabilities, and optimization of long-term O&M costs, as well as despite the increasing flexibility of operating regimes.
Company on 25th June '26 consummated acquisition of Nahapara plant which contributed ₹15 crores in the quarter.
Lower contribution of thermal generation was partly offset by increase in gain from distribution and neighborhood segments.
The second reason on the distribution and transmission segment in total is is contributed 71% additional profit driven by three factors. First, receipt of favorable orders from the regulator supporting carrying cost of 41 crore. This is a normal course of business due to regulatory asset we have we we we have and we are getting the favorable regulatory orders.
Second, improve contribution from the operations by 19 crores supported by two factors. First, increase in ROE and ROCE on account of capitalization of assets and high and higher rate of returns on equity as per the new tariff regulations and other incentives. The third is, second is improved contribution from the distribution franchise business on back of improved volumes and increased tariff. Volume across the financial distribution business improved by 4%.
The third reason is additionally new commissioning transmission project has contributed ₹11 crores in criminal profit.
Coming to the renewable operations, we have renewable operations contribute 19 crores positive contributions.
Due to generation from newly newly recommissioned capacity and improved PLF across the wind and solar, both partially offsetted by gain in similar quarter previous in the similar quarter of the previous year and account of LPS income on delayed payments.
The fourth reason is other factors lowering the profit to 90 crores. There are two main reasons. First, increase in the finance cost on the back of higher capitalization and related borrowings. And second, increase in miscellaneous expenses and depreciation which was on account of higher capitalization mainly in debt renewal segments.
This completes the explanation of the financial performance during the quarter. Coming to the
Update of the various projects and implementations.
Renewable energy project of 70 megawatt got commissioned during the quarter taking up the aggregate install capacity install generation capacity of the company to 6.6 gigawatt as on 30th June 2026 comprising of 2.7 gigawatt gas based project, 1.8 gigawatt coal based project and 2.1 gigawatt renewable capacity.
First on renewable energy projects, as on 30th June '26, renewable energy equals to 4.6 gigawatts under implementation, which we expect to commission progressively as under.
One about 1.2 gigawatt capacity is expected to commission in FY current year FY27. Between 1.4 to 1.6 gigawatt capacity is expected to commission in Nexus which is FY28 and balance capacity in FY29.
CAPEX of 1550 crores was incurred during the quarter against 1200 crores of CAPEX in Q4 FY26 and 355 crores of CAPEX in Q1 of FY26. This is comparable quarter of the last year.
After total capex of 29,600 crores of in RE projects under implementation, cumulative capex of 8,800 crores has been incurred up to 30th June 26. In FY 27, total capex of approximately 10,000 crores expected to be incurred for all RE projects.
Moving on to the implementation under the Anukul thermal project of 1.6 gigawatt, the update is as under first. Activity are underway wherein following major milestones have been achieved. First, power cell power cell agreement executive with MC Power Management Company Limited. Second, letter of award issued to the BTG as well as balance of plan. Third, environment clearance received for the for the project. The fourth, the project is expected to be commissioned in next six to seven years. A total capex of
₹450 crores has been incurred as of April 30th, June 2026.
Coming on the firm storage hydro project of 3 gigawatt in Maharashtra, the update is,
The activities are underway wherein following major milestones have been achieved. First, energy storage facility agreement with MSC was executed. Later of award issued to the civil, hydro, mechanical and cyclist and second, electrical and mechanical cyclist. Environment and foreign clearance has been received for the project. The project is expected to commission in next three four three to four years and total expenditure of 1130 crores has been incurred to 30th June 2026.
It is a transmission project. Solapur is under implementation, expected to be commissioned this year. Cumulative capital of ₹330 crores has been incurred as on 30th June 2026.
Further details on the pipe and project have been summarized in our latest invessor presentation available on our website. That's all for the quarters. Now I request coordinator to open line for Q and A session. If you satisfy to stay safe and healthy. Thank you so much. Handing over to the operators.
Thank you very much. We will now begin with the question and answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star and then one on their touch screen phone. If you wish to remove yourself from the question queue, you may press star and two.
Participants are requested to use handsets while asking a question. Ladies and gentlemen, we will wait for a moment while the question queue assembles.
Your first question comes from the line of Mohit Kumar with ICICI Securities. Please go ahead.
Yes, ma'am. Good evening, sir, and thanks for the opportunity. My question is on Nabha Power. Can you help us with the revenue adjusted a bit on Nabha Power for Q1 and gross state on the current power post the acquisition of Nabha?
So the Q1 we acquired on the 25th of June. So that is hardly five five days of income we have booked not for the entire quarter. So five days I would say was about
Total means very overall 15 plus profit we have booked in the in our in our as well not material amount we have booked because it's a five days operation we have consolidated in our books of accounts.
Now as far as gross debt is concerned, so it is around ₹6000 crores, ₹6500 crores of gross debt which is added in the books.
Because of the NABHA power project, about 3000 crores in the NABHA power book and about 3800 crores in the Torrent power book.
Understood. Is it fair to expect that now power will add 250 code a pita per quarter going forward?
So on a on a yeah, you are right. So on a steady state basis around 1000 crores of EBITDA should be should be a good enough number.
Okay.
Yes, exactly.
Understood. Second question is, uh,
Cash flow business not on the reported because they are following the policy not in a cash flow business. I understand sir. They just see accounting with cash flow business here not on the reported business because reported business is adjusted a bit.
Understand sir, the SCA accounting is clear.
Adjusted a bit. Yeah.
Yes, I just say beta, yes.
The second question is, can health be the reason for lower contribution to EBITDA of renewables in this quarter, despite 30% increase in generation? I'm talking about EBITDA which is, which was, which you reported in this segmental, yeah. I see only 20 crore incremental.
So differential you can see this number, but if you look at recollect that the last last year similar quarter we have a income about 47 crores of the LPS claim was available, which was not available in the current quarter. That is why you are seeing the differential number will be lower, otherwise on a standard basis number is higher as far as EBIDA is concerned.
Oh, that's on the RE side, right sir? RE side talking about.
R is ID S, R is ID R, I'm talking about.
I'm just to say my last question, sir. Of course, I think we spoke about the capitalist finiture program for FY20, ₹10000 crore. But how much you've incurred in the Q1?
Q1 we have total incurred
So around ₹1500 crores are incurred in Q1 for renewable projects.
Okay.
For the RD project.
What are you putting here?
We haven't spent anything on the coal, nothing on the PSP in the Q1. That's right, sir?
Thermal basically coal we have incurred about 125 crores.
35 Understood Understood Very helpful sir Thank you sir Thank you best of luck sir
Thank you.
Your next question comes from the line of Satyadeep Jain with Ambit Capital. Please go ahead.
Hi, thank you. First of all, I wanted to understand your demand across different distribution circuits. So while Ahmedabad you registered 10% volume growth YY, the Surat, Dadra Nagar, Haveli, all these other licenses and all had very muted growth. Just trying to understand what was happening in these regions when overall at the all India level we had very strong growth in the quarter.
And the ATNC losses also increase in all these, almost all circles, ATNC losses increase substantially. So both demand and ATNC losses.
So, you Ahmedabad is a benchmark, I would say 10% is the growth which is comparable with the country's average, I would say. Surat being a industrial town, always growth will be not comparable with the overall demand growth, I would say.
Dahej is also an industrial area basically, so it's comparable to the Surat growth. ENS, GDS, there is some lower demand is an exceptional case, I would say. It's not a repetitive kind of a nature.
in terms of ATSC losses I would say in Agra particularly the last year similar quarter we have we got some good realization from our Agra Nigam Nigam Limited past realization we got which has which has reduced our ATSC loss substantially which is not the case in the current quarter. So that is what the difference I would say in ATSC losses.
Otherwise, the the material is not material different I would say as compared to the last. Agra is the main there is a substantial difference in Agra mainly because of the higher relaxation we have received in the comparable quarter of last year, which is not the case in the current quarter.
Okay. So what was the, I'm not sure if I listed it in the opening remarks, what was the merchant EBITDA and energy EBITDA in this quarter?
So differential lower profit is about 87 crores. That's what we have said. And we sold about 445 MUs in the merchant market in the current quarter.
And this was largely in high demand market.
Yes, yes, yes, yes.
Okay. Just trying to understand how do you look at this market, given you have a large un-tied capacity and many players are adding battery, and given the merchant best installations that we see for this year and in projections, do you see a case for any risk? How do you evaluate merchant gas potential for you?
potential for you. If you look at the demand pattern in the country where the peak demand and the summer demand will will always be there and now the peak demand period is also prolonging I would say. So during the evening time and the summer time we keep on getting this opportunity in the merchant market for our mutualized capacity and kind of capacity I would say. So being the when the gas price thing become normal we will keep on getting more opportunities are going forward I would say.
lastly on some there is some delay in one FTRE project it seems and some other projects also slides I know you're talking about 1.2 gigawatt in general for this year but are you seeing any delays on the these are all some of these are your own discoms I've seen like STU are you seeing some delays in STU commissioning and the latest estimate you have for 1.2 gigawatt what kind of visibility do you have for
Transmission availability.
So as you know, as you are aware that the these all these project connectivity really means transmission line availability basically. Commission of the transmission line onward transmission line is bit of a issue and some of the some of them because of the ROW issues, which we are trying to work with the transmission utility to ensure see that the they should come their project on time so that our our project progress should also align with them, their timeline.
And Satyadev what we have said is after factoring in all those issues. So our expectation is that we should achieve this target what we have given. Now if something unfortunate happens we'll we'll update you on a quarterly basis. But this is what we feel that it's a reasonable estimate right now looking at the current scenario.
Okay, thank you so much.
Thank you. Before we take the next question, a reminder to all the participants. You may press star and then one to ask a question. The next question comes from the line of Sumit Kishore with access character. Please go ahead.
Good evening. My first question is in relation to your 1.2 gigawatt peak commissioning target, what kind of phase out are you expecting of project commissioning after 70 megawatt in Q1? Is it likely to be more Q3, Q4 heavy or is there any phase out that we should be mindful of?
So, we expect about though first quarter our commissioning was 70 megawatt, but by two two we expect about 400 megawatt will get commission and the balance will happen in the H2 I would say. That is what that is what we are progressing.
Okay, so H2 will be about 800 megawatt peak and H1 is 400.
Yes, exactly.
Okay.
And we were reading in the media that your Amgen plant is supposed to be sort of shifted to another location and in due of that you would set up a 800 megawatt replacement power plant. Is there what is the official what is your version of what has developments have happened so far?
Hello
So MGN power project is about 362 megawatt capacity and it is it we have a permission to run up to December 2030. And what has happened is since after December 30 it's not going to be in operation. So we we have requests and it's a basically plant available for the Ahmedabad distribution. So we request the state government for the coal allocation. Double the coal allocation of capacity of 362 megawatt. So that coal state government has
approve the coal allocation, but they have to they have requested the central government for the coal allocation. Once the central government approves the coal allocation for this plant, he planned to set up a about close to about 8 megawatt unit to replace the engine power plant. That is what the plan is.
So has the land for this plant been allocated to you?
No, I think it we are working out on where exactly to place the plant. So it may not be in Gujarat also. So so we are working on that where where this new plant will come in.
So work in progress kind of thing right now, but the core allocation is being done by the state government. We require the central government for the allocation. Once the allocation is available, then we form up our plan and implement one unit of IT net make out for the to declare the Amgen power project.
Okay. Quarter on quarter we have seen some movement in your RE portfolio mainly around C and I project. So what is your general outlook for the year in terms of how your portfolio for RE will build up? Is there any traction that you're seeing in terms of bidding activity, tendering activity for RE projects? Your thoughts here will help.
So we are participating almost all the projects but as we as you know our philosophy restrict our meeting at some point of time so that we can at least achieve in IRR. So that is what the philosophy we continue to adopt going forward also. We our benchmark will be the IRR not the to acquire the more and more capacity. So that is what philosophy we are following and we continue to follow that philosophy going forward.
Okay. Thank you.
Yeah.
Thank you, participants.
You may press star and then one to ask a question now.
A reminder to all the participants, you may press star and then one to ask a question.
Question.
Uh, our next question comes from Apurva Bahadur from IIFL. Please go ahead.
Hi sir, thank you for the opportunity. Sir, I want to know your thoughts on a couple of things. First of all, on this increased competition from batteries, I think you touched upon this a little bit earlier as well. But where do you see the marginal cost of gas power settlement sort of heading towards given the price at which probably batteries can supply electricity. And also secondly, I would also like to know your thoughts if
Do we have any plans of entering the PNI space?
No, so I think Apura there are two two questions here. So if you are asking the levelized cost of energy battery versus gas power plants, right? So now with these elevated gas prices, the cost of variable cost would be higher for our LNG merchant power plants. But if you look at slightly in a short term or a long term horizon, we expect that gas prices should settle somewhere in the range of five to eight dollars, six to eight dollars per MMBTU. Now if that is the scenario, your variable cost would be around 4 rupees, 4 and a half ru
which is very competitive even compared to battery also because I think 2, 2 and a half rupee of solar cost plus if you add 3 rupees of battery cost that would be 5, 5 and a half rupees of battery storage solution cost. So I think we are confident enough that our gas based power plant particularly in merchant markets would be highly competitive. That is the first question if I'm not wrong, right? I think on the second part if you can just reiterate what was the second question?
Okay.
Right, so second question is on your views regarding the CNI market, the corporate market. Even for your open gas project, is there any plan to maybe tie it up with a data center to supply sort of firm power or any of those thoughts?
So, I think as far as gas based power plants are concerned, with C and I segment, I think C and I segment would want renewable power. Be it on RTC or anything, they would want a renewable power. So gas may not fit into that category. On as far as data centers are concerned, so we are looking at those opportunities. As of now, there is nothing concrete to to tell you on on data centers where we can tie up our gas based power plants. But again, data centers also are looking at more
sort of renewable energy. So scope of that is slightly lower and also on a economic side or commercial side if you look at it, I cannot hedge my gas based prices, gas prices on a long term basis. So if I do an PPA for a long tenor with a fixed price, there is an inheritance risk which I'm taking by locking in my tariff. So I think as of now in a short to medium term we don't see tying up gas based power plants on a merchant.
Sorry, on C and I or on data center basis.
Sure sir, understood. Thanks a lot.
Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Shriram Kapoor with Jefferies, please go ahead.
Hi sir, thanks for the opportunity. just firstly on your renewable renewable segment where previous participant also asked about the lower EBITDA year on year. you mentioned that we had some favorable claims from last year that is not available this year. Are we is that could you maybe quantify how much that was for the full year and is that going to be absent for this entirety of FY27? As in is this a fair fair run sort of quarterly margin
trade to assume for the balance of the year, we're going to see it reduce each quarter.
So, Shirom, I think we will not be able to give you guidance for the full year. But if I if I tell you on the absolute basis this year, the profit was around higher or EBITDA was higher by around 66 crores, which compared to previous year, there was a LPS income which was booked previous year, which is 46 crores. So if you remove 46 crores, then the EBITDA is higher by 66 crores.
Right, so and in the entirety of FY26, could you quantify how much was that LPS gain, which, you know, might be in FY20, yeah, for the full year.
For a few years.
For the full year, this was the number. So in Q1, the LPA was 46 crores and for the full year also was the same number.
understood. Got it, got it. And just secondly on your the the capacity pipeline that you shared in your presentation for quite a few of the projects, it seems that you have, you know, maybe delayed you know, your expectation of when the plants are going to come up. You know, for example, you know, SEKI SEKI 12, SEKI 16 wind, they've been slightly extended into FY20 8 as well. Similarly for your hives.
of hybrid projects. Could you explain, you know, what is driving this delay in capacity addition plans? Is it maybe transmission infra? Is it some, you know, any other delays if you could explain that?
So it is mainly because of transition availability because of the we plan our execution based on the onwards transition line. So it coincides the transition line and transition line is basically large like PGCRIS and other places are developing. So we plan our execution in a way so that we can there will not be any.
CAPEX which will be ahead of the CAPEX spanning, not ahead of the transition line availabilities.
Understood, sir. And just if you could share a couple of bookkeeping details here. One is, I know you said Nabha Power plant was only operational for 6 days, but if you could give sort of an indicative PLF for those 6 days, how much that was. And then secondly on, you know, your expenses, basically we're seeing your employee costs have actually come down year on year. So is there any reason for that and are we expected to see employee costs further reduce?
You're only on the subsequent quarters?
Nabha about your first question about Nabha PLF quarterly about about 85% PLF. So that is what generally the PLF level of Nabha regarding the reduction in salary cost is maybe a one of items maybe because of the capitalization we have capitalized more salary cost there is no other specific reason that the issue is continuing to go coming down.
Right, sir. Um, got it. Thank you so much. Um, I, oh that's it. Thanks.
Thank you. Next question comes from the line of Atul Tiwari with JP Morgan. Please go ahead.
Yes, thanks a lot. Sir, on the LNG availability and pricing, you know, what is the kind of availability you are seeing? I believe you had indicated that you had contracted a few cargos in the last call. So are they coming through and what is the landed price currently?
So, three cargos which was contracted for the summer meeting, summer demand was already acquired and getting used also. So, as for the balance period, we we bank on the
Basically spot cargo, so we are ranking the spot cargo. So as and when the opportunity is available, we import the cargo on a spot basis. But the next round was yes, we have a contract of 10 cargos available. So which will be at a lease with the brand trade not at the spot price because spot price is higher at at about $20 kind of a thing. So it is not affordable. So we we plan our purchase in a way that it is affordable to the consumer and we can able to get
better margin basically. It's affordable in the merchant market also so that we can have a reasonable margin available in the merchant market also. So this year only it's a merchant market we are looking at plus whatever summer demand was there we have we have we have completed we have honored our summer demand by these importing free cargos.
And as far as availability is concerned, there is no issue of availability. It is the question of what price those cargos are available. So if required, we can import as many cargos as you want, but the issue is of the price. So we keep on looking at what is the demand and what is the price which can be absorbed under our TPAs and under the merchant market.
Okay sir. And sir, what were the capex in the first quarter? I missed that number. I think you said it.
About total CAPEX is about 2000 2300 crores all put together. Renewable is 1550 crores and thermal CAPEX is 125 crores and transmission is about 120 crores and light distribution is about 500 crores.
Okay sir, thank you, thank you sir.
Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Harsh Singh with Samiksha Capital. Please go ahead.
Right. Thank you for taking my question. So just one thing, sir. What's particularly recall from the IT distribution business, is there anything to see in the pipeline in terms of new business from the IT business?
Voice is not audible, your voice is not audible.
Amount of now
Yeah, you can, you can go ahead.
It is still the same. If I can request you to use the handset, please.
Ah yes, exactly. So echo is coming.
Am I audible now?
Yes
Yes sir, this is much better.
So thank you for taking my question. Just one thing. So on the franchise distribution side, is there anything in the pipeline in terms of any new franchise franchisees that the UP are to be partnered and anything that you could provide there in terms of guidance?
I think UP will come post election only. So they have tried to they have attempt to do it before election but I think considering the the agitations and all those things I think it is going to come post election UP election. the the as you know there is a state subject thing is there but we expect something if come something will come possibly in the state of Maharashtra. otherwise there is no concrete things I would say
In the franchises right now.
Understood, thank you for sharing. No other questions from us, right?
Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Vishal with PL Capital. Please go ahead.
Yes, thanks for the opportunity. I think this could be linked with the previous I mean one of the question participant asked. So so Dijan plan that is is on imported LNG and in this quarter we also reported a PLF, though it's a lower PLF, but we are able to generate and sell power. So so I mean like you know at a $20 MMBTU, are they still buyers, takers? That's why there's a PLF or cargo is we are getting at a lower rate and that's why we are able to sell.
So just to get a perspective on that.
So, if you look at $20, your very real cost will be about ₹13 kind of a thing. So though it's very difficult I would say, but since we have our old cargos available, we are able to buy at a competitive rate in bits and pockets I would say, which will which will help us in selling the targeting the merchant market, peak demand period kind of a thing. Basically sub demand and peak demand kind of market. We are able to sell at a much higher rate.
then earn our contribution in the on those market right. So $20 is quite challenging I would say at this rate.
So I think we should just add at $20 you can you can sell in a high DM market, not not in the regular market which is a cap at ₹10. So we have been selling in the high DM market and we have been getting better realization. This is this is doable because we have we have made a lot of flexibilization in our plants wherein frequent start and stops can be done and can be run on a cyclical basis. So a variable cost would be higher but at $20 we are able to serve serve the high DM market but they will not give you a discount.
give you an opportunity to work at a very high PLS. This is about 2-3 hours of every day, 2-3 hours you can get that pricing.
Okay.
Yes
And certain slots also, the slot on a continuous 2-3 hours visit. It's a very challenging $20 to sell at a sell power at a $20 MIBTU is quite challenging I would say.
Okay, okay. And then the cargos that you have mentioned, so at what rate we are able to get it or are we exhausted or probably I mean still it's there and then we can have still maybe like you know mid team sort of PLF in quarter 2 and 3 going forward also.
cargos was mainly for our distribution business. So, for making the summer demand. So, but though any opportunity is available, we keep on buying in a small lot, not in a big cargo, full cargo kind of a quantity.
Okay, okay, okay. Sure, so I think that's all from my side. Thank you.
Thank you. A reminder to all the participants, you may press star.
And then one to ask a question.
As there are no further questions from the participants, I now hand the conference over to the management for closing comments.
Thank you everybody for joining Torrent Power Hour calls. Stay safe and healthy. Thank you so much.
Thank you. On behalf of Torrent Power Limited, that concludes this conference. Thank you everyone for joining us and you may now disconnect your lines. Thank you.
Thank you.