27 Jul 2026
First, a question on the macro situation in relation to thermal. We have been seeing that between 12 to 1 p.m., several thermal power plants in the country are likely operating below technical minimum. What has been your experience for your thermal fleet? And how do you see this situation progressing in coming times?
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Right. Yes, Sumit, thank you. Very correct because this is a peak time when the solar generation is at its peak. But just to tell you that for us, barring, of course, the load factor reduces. But what we have gone -- what our experience during the entire quarter has been that because of the attractive tariffs at Mahanadi, our backdowns or reductions have been the minimum because of the merit order. And the minimum load that we have seen in the case of Utkal has not gone below 60%; this has been the case in most cases. But overall, on a round-the-clock basis, if you talk for the month of July when the power demand has grown almost 12% till date, we have been operating at almost more than 85% PLF and more than 90% availability. So we have not experienced anything in terms of the technical minimum load. In other plants, we don't need, but we are building the capability to even operate at maybe below 50% also, which we have already done in our Ratnagiri and Vijayanagar plants.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Sumit, just to add that we continue to recover our fixed costs in these kinds of backdowns. We are not kind of impacted. And we also have the flexibility to kind of sell that in the merchant market, in case that happens.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Sure. My second question on the thermal space is you have introduced 600 MW Mahanadi under under construction projects now. And combined with Salboni Phase 1, how is the ramp-up on BTG sourcing for these projects progressing, particularly your arrangement with GE for the acquisition that you had made? How is that shaping up? JSW Energy Limited July 22, 2026 Page 7 of 16 So what is your nameplate capacity in terms of internal manufacturing for boilers, turbines and generators today? And given you are looking to commission 600 MW Mahanadi by FY28, how is that going to pan out in terms of equipment sourcing?
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Right. Sumit, I'll answer to both Mahanadi as well as the Salboni, what you have asked. See, in case of Mahanadi, we have been saying, maybe since the first call after acquiring this asset last year, that the fourth unit of 600 MW, almost 30% - 40% of the work was already completed. And balance of plant already ready when we talk, of course, coal handling plant or ash handling or railway or transmission network, everything is already in place. This unit is getting completed through the same suppliers who had supplied the material earlier because part material also of turbine and other things is available with us for the fourth unit. So we have placed the orders, and the material is under dispatch and all. So we will be, as we have said, in FY28, the commissioning of the next fourth unit. We are on track for that, and it will be through the Chinese suppliers only. For another 2 units, we are in discussions, and we will be making the announcement at the right time very soon that what is our strategy for fifth and sixth unit to make it from 1.8 to 3.6 GW. Now, coming to Salboni, as we have announced earlier also, maybe 2 x 800 Phase 1, with the turbine generator order has already been placed to TJPS, Toshiba JSW Power Systems, and the work has already started, the suppliers deliveries and commissioning are in line with the PPA timelines Regarding the boiler, that is the GE facility of Durgapur, which we are in the process of acquisition, maybe by end of this quarter, it is expected that it will be there. That has a nameplate capacity as of now, as is where is basis is 1.1 GW, means if we say 800 MW boiler, it can make 1.3 boilers in a year. But with some de-bottlenecking and some minor investment, what we have already planned, this will go to 2 x 800, means 1.6 GW capacity because the TJPS, Toshiba JSW plant in Chennai is already having a capacity of 2 x 800. So these 2 will be benchmarked together, and this will be there. So this is the strategy. But we are totally de-risked in terms of the supply chain of boiler, turbine, generators for all our 800 MW expansion plants.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Okay. Just one last question on your external order for 200 MW/400 MWh battery assembly facility. So what has the battery assembly facility scaled up to? And what does this external contract mean in terms of margins? And what value it will add in JSW Energy?
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Yes. Just to tell you the readiness of the plant, we have already completed the trials. We have already supplied, maybe not a big quantity, but at least some orders we have supplied also to the third party. And plant is fully ready to start producing and meet the schedules, supplies as per the schedule, which has been agreed by the buyer. And regarding the financial, I'll request Prabhakaran. He will just let you know on the margins. JSW Energy Limited July 22, 2026 Page 8 of 16
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
So I think here, in terms of the margin in dollar terms, it's in the range of about $2.75 to $3. If you look at the overall capacity running, it will be about $15 million in a year. So that's how we are saying you can get about close to ₹ 150-odd crores of EBITDA from this project.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
The next question is from Apoorva Bahadur from IIFL Capital.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
On this, the expansion for fourth unit, you mentioned that you have placed the order for remaining equipment from Chinese suppliers. Will there be any restriction on us in terms of tying this up with the state utility or do we plan to use it in the merchant or captive market?
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
No, see, the thing is that those are only the guardrails. There is no such regulation in this, and a lot of states are looking for , one thing which has to be important, there are more than one state who are interested. Keeping in mind now that with so much of solar and this question was asked in the very beginning that maybe the technical minimum coming down, so some of the buyers are preferring 600 MW and lower capacity tie-up because even if they have to do the back down, it is comfortably at 50%. We are seeing a lot of interest, especially with the way international coal prices are moving and the way the currency direction is going, a lot of imported coal-based power buying is there, and they are looking to replace it with domestic coal. So, we are confident that this will happen. And in this case, because we have got the permission also from the authorities for this partial import to complete the asset, this fourth unit, so we don't see that as a challenge, and there is a lot of interest we are seeing in terms of signing PPA. But to remember, even if it is merchant, with next to the mine and the coal cost being so low, the cost at which we will be completing this project, another 600 MW, will be significantly lower than the benchmark per MW cost of capacity addition, I think this will remain attractive in both the ways, whether it is merchant or whether it is in long-term PPA. So we will take a call. But PPA opportunities, we are absolutely confident will be happening.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Sure, sir. Understood. Sir, secondly, on this BESS business return profile, I think sir highlighted that we'll intend to make around $2.75 to $3 per KWh of storage capacity. Do you see a glide path towards improving the value addition and the margins over here or this is something that you're looking like an exit margin from this business?
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Yes. I think this is more from the assembly, whatever we are doing, and I think this is what we're looking at. We will keep exploring opportunities, especially since the government has also come up with a PLI kind of incentive for setting up cells and related facilities. We'll continue to evaluate that. But in terms of whatever we have invested, I think this is the kind of return profile that we will have.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Yes. And also to add what Prabhakaran just said in terms of the value addition, the opportunities which we have identified going forward is that of backward integration and maybe instead of importing the cells, maybe making the cells in India, for which we are in discussion with various technology partners. JSW Energy Limited July 22, 2026 Page 9 of 16 And second is in terms of scaling up. Like today, it is a 5 MWh of container size, which is there. Going forward, we are building the capability even if -- when the product is available, the components are available instead from 5 to make it to 6,7 or 8 which becomes more cost efficient for us as well as to the buyer also.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
And sir, do we have a long-term partnership with the supplier from China for importing the cells?
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Right now, no. Right now, no.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
The warranties for this BESS are typically in this industry are given by the OEM, right, the cell manufacturer?
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Yes, yes.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Sir, I would also like to touch upon the connectivity for our renewable capacity. I think very helpful, you have provided in the presentation about this 3 GW, so remaining 1.9 GW connectivity in FY27. Is all of it operational, first of all? And secondly, what's the update for FY28? Do we have the full connectivity capacity operational in '28 as well?
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Yes. I'll come to that. As I said, till date, in the current year since April 1, we have commissioned 1.1 GW of fresh capacity. Just to tell you that out of this 1.1 GW, 300 MW right now is under TGNA, which is facing curtailment. This is getting converted as the new capacity is getting commissioned. And we are almost certain that before 31st August, this will get converted into GNA. Once it gets converted into GNA, then there will be no curtailment. So, this 300 MW, which is currently under curtailment and one earlier project, which I have mentioned last time as well, the 400 MW O2 Power project in Rajasthan that we acquired, is also under TGNA. The connectivity for that project was expected to be ready by July-end and is now expected sometime in September or October. So we will be waiting for that till then. These 2 projects remain under TGNA. Now, balance 1.9 GW, which we have to commission in this year, I just want to tell you that out of this 28% of the capacity of 1.9 GW, what we are doing, maybe more than 530 MW of balance 1.9 GW, which we have to execute, is our group captive, which is a mix of off grid also. Majority of the capacity is off-grid, which is we have a dedicated transmission line of ours, not connected to the grid, is insulated. So this 530 MW is totally insulated. Another is that a significant part of what we are doing with utilities, there also we have the connectivity fully in place and operational, which is a mix of STU as well as the CTU. And also, the C&I projects that we are going to execute for our C&I customers during the current year. So these are the 3 mixes. But whatever 1,900 MW we have to commission to reach the 3 GW guidance we have given, we are absolutely 100% secured from connectivity and which is all commissioned also.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
And for FY28? JSW Energy Limited July 22, 2026 Page 10 of 16
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
And for FY28, we will definitely come back to you. We have, but yes, as I have been saying earlier also that the 2 areas we are in focus is for the year, maybe -- these 2 are the major driving factors based on which we'll be giving so that there is a surety of the numbers which are being achieved. But we will be definitely giving at the right time. Very soon, we will come back for FY28 also.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Appreciate it, sir. If I may squeeze in just one more question on wind generation. PLFs appear to be a little bit weaker YoY. I think last year was exceptionally strong. Like hydro, are you also seeing them recover in July or they continue to trend lower?
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Yes. We have seen a significant recovery. And normally, if you see, it is a very clearly established, there are patterns. When there are heavy rains, the temperature drops, normally, the wind speed is related, and it improves, which we have also seen. In July, if you see, as compared to previous month, the PLF is already higher by about 5% to 6%.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
The next question is from Satyadeep Jain from Ambit Capital.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Pump storage projects, you've given some details. I think first time I'm seeing some, actually the 2 projects specified. Just maybe if you can, you've shared some details on readiness, but maybe if you can elaborate on what is the capex you're expecting? And what is the level of confidence in achieving this commissioning that you mentioned?
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Yes. See, as I told you that there are 2 PPA, which we have signed. One is the Bhavali project in Maharashtra with MSEDCL of 1,500 MW. And another is in UP, Kandhaura, of 1,680 MW, out of which 1,500 MW PPA has been signed with the state of UP. Regarding the readiness, in Bhavali, we are fully ready in terms of whether it is the environment clearance, which we have received. The land acquisition, majorly it has been done. Some part is left, but that is not in the core project area. So that is not going to have any impact. That will carry on parallelly. And then the third is the forest Stage 1 clearance has already been received. So we are at a very advanced stage. The ordering has already been placed, like for entire civil work, the order has been placed to L&T. For electromechanical, the order has been placed to Voith, so we are fully ready in terms of, and already the mobilization, the construction power also has already been awarded, and the connectivity has already been done, which you can see also in the slide. So we are ready with that in terms of execution and meeting the time lines we don't see as a challenge and especially with our experience and expertise of executing greenfield hydro projects in very tough terrains of Himalayas in Himachal Pradesh, here, the quality of rock, the ease of executing the project comparatively is much easier as compared to that. I'll not say easy, but definitely, the difficulty levels are much lesser. The tunneling part is very, very less as compared to what it is there in Himalayas in the projects. So we are absolutely confident of meeting the timelines in terms of the PPA timelines. Of course, if there is any delay JSW Energy Limited July 22, 2026 Page 11 of 16 in terms of the availability of power evacuation by the state, then only it can be, but we don't see that as a challenge also. So Bhavali, we are absolutely certain. Kandhaura, as I told you, that we have already secured the ESC recommendation for EC from Ministry of Environment and Forest and application for the forest clearance has already been submitted and connectivity application also has been submitted to the UP authorities. So civil work and construction award process is on, and we expect all the readiness by maybe in the last quarter of the current fiscal, the readiness to start the execution work at this site also and to be within the time lines. Regarding the capex, we will come back. But as I said to you that rather than maybe we are not particularly for a project, maybe giving a capex is not the thing, But I can tell you that this offers very, very high returns. In terms of when we say benchmark returns of mid-teen IRRs, here, I can say it will be significantly high-teen IRRs, we can say, is what we are absolutely confident with the tariff and the cost at which the most of the ordering has already happened.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Is it safe to assume maybe ₹ 5 crores per MW or something any benchmark?
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Not very far from this number, you can say that. Not very far from this number.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
And the thermal capex you mentioned for Mahanadi for the coming expansion. Can you maybe indicate what kind of capex we can look at for the 600 MW and the remaining capacity
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
See, I can tell you at what we execute the greenfield project we are doing at Salboni also, for which we have placed the order. Boiler, we are going to do ourselves. Civil part order, we have already placed. The work has started. We know we have a fair idea of the completing a greenfield project there. As compared to that, Mahanadi, when we will be completing, I can say definitely that we will be at least 25% to 30% lower while doubling the capacity from 1,800 MW to 3,600 MW.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Okay. Just lastly on TGNA, what was the curtailment, if you can mention, in this quarter for overall for these 2 projects
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
See, wind plus solar put together, we had a curtailment of 69 MU during the quarter. But as I told you, this has to be divided into 2. There were curtailments under the GNA projects also, for which the power was being supplied under the PPA. There, it is being treated as deemed as a plant availability, and we are getting the tariff against this supply, even if there is a backdown because my buyer has scheduled in the exchange to draw the power. My plant is available, even if I'm being asked by the load center not to put the power, my buyer is getting the power, and I'm getting my money for this power under the GNA. Yes, Prabhakaran, you can add.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Yes. I think in terms of the overall revenue, it's not material. It's about ₹ 15 crores this quarter for us. JSW Energy Limited July 22, 2026 Page 12 of 16
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
The next question is from Nikhil Nigania from Bernstein.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
It's in continuation on the earlier question on pump storage projects. I wanted to understand if there is any update on the Karnataka tender, where the tariffs look even more attractive than the ones you have in the other 2 projects?
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Yes. Karnataka also we have, for which we have got the letter, some local clearances and all which are at an advanced stage, which are under discussion. And we expect that also soon to be sorted and the PPA will be signed, for which we have already received the letter That relates to the Narihalla project in Karnataka, yes.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Okay. Understood. And any reason we did not participate in the recent SECI tender, where again, tariff discovered was very attractive for pump storage projects where only 3 bidders had come?
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
See, in this in this tender, the condition was that there has to be forest clearance, stage 1, in place, those only can apply. That was the case. So we were not having any other site ready with forest clearance stage 1 clearance. So we had decided not to participate. But just to give you an update that we are now ready with another site of almost close to about 9 GWh and which as and when any opportunity comes, we'll be participating in that. But we have not participated because we are not ready with forest Stage 1 clearance, which was a pre-condition.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Got it. Makes sense. And one last question I had. Any plans to set up Merchant battery storage plant?
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Can you repeat, please?
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Does JSW Energy have any plans to set up Merchant battery energy storage plants?
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
See, right now, no. But yes, we are exploring keeping in mind the gaps and the requirements which are coming up because the thermal capacity, which is going to take care of the evening peak is still a few years away and the way demand growth is there. So, there is an opportunity because this also is a place where the solar plant exists, and the solar radiation is good, and the connectivity is available. The same connectivity can be used post solar hours. So connectivity is not a challenge. And solar capacity to charge the battery can be built at a very attractive cost because only DC side is to be done. So that reduces the solar capacity charges capex significantly. So those are the things we are exploring. And at the right time, we will be definitely exploring when it makes sense that our benchmark returns are protected, we'll definitely be looking into this to take care of evening peak advantage.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
The next question is from Dhruv Muchhal from HDFC Asset Management.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Sir, the PLF across your thermal plants this quarter are lower, say, for example, YoY. This is despite a very strong demand season. For example, Ratnagiri is lower, Vijayanagar is lower. Rajasthan is also lower, but anyways it does not matter much. Utkal is almost equal despite a long-term PPA. JSW Energy Limited July 22, 2026 Page 13 of 16 I thought you have a long-term PPA, you have better schedule, and hence, you can sell more in the short term. So the PLF could have been higher. KSK, I understand there was issues. So I mean, is this because of the solar thing, which is causing all this, and we are not looking at it rightly? I'm just trying to understand what caused this. The demand was very strong?
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Yes, I'll come to plant-wise, not really because of the solar power and the backdowns which are there. I'll start with Utkal. Utkal, there was a shutdown which was planned, which was important for us to take to ensure the annual availability of the plant, which is critical after the signing of the power purchase agreement. So there was a large portion of this in quarter 1, wherein the unit was not available, 1 unit. So that was the reason of lower PLF in Utkal. So this was one. And now, if we see that in the month of June, the availability and the PLFs have significantly improved. And in the month of July, the availability is in excess of 91% in case of Utkal. So we are not facing, as I told in the beginning only when someone asked about the PLF. Our PLFs, even during the peak solar hour in case of Utkal, it has not gone below 58% to 60%. It is almost 60% of the PLF we have been operating. So those are not the reasons. It was that we had taken the shutdown to improve the reliability and the performance because we were foreseeing the demand, given the way May had started and how demand was shaping up in May and June, we decided to take that because July also when we are seeing the power demand growth at maybe 12% in July. So we have deliberately did that. And now, the plant is back on track. Coming to Ratnagiri, Ratnagiri, the PLF has been down for the reasons that one is that with no impact on our financials, the reason is that this is again a 2-part tariff where we have to ensure the availability for our group captive -- large capacities under group captive, which we are doing, and one unit is with MSEDCL. So there also, it was again a plant shutdown to ensure the annual availability we have to ensure we achieve of 80% so that's my fixed cost. So this is not without any impact. And also, in the month of June, there was a reduced demand, extreme weather conditions also when the rains started when we saw that in Maharashtra. So that is all by design. As I told, MSEDCL, this Mahanadi, you are aware yourself that what happened, which we have recovered. Now, the availability has been 100% in July.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Got it. And sir, even on the solar PLF, if I look at your slide, the number is about 21%. Last year was also 21%. Given the AC/DC that you typically do, and also this time, probably the weather was also relatively favorable. I'm just wondering -- I mean, is this because of curtailment that the number is low or I mean, I thought it should trend towards somewhere, I don't know, 24%- 25%.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Yes. See, the thing is if you see the trend also in the country, normally, the second half of the year for solar is always better post monsoon. Also, of course, as I told that 400 MW capacity, where we have been facing curtailment. All those things normalize, then it is coming 21%. But, otherwise, PLFs have been much higher as compared to this is after the impact of the curtailment also. JSW Energy Limited July 22, 2026 Page 14 of 16
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Because if I look at your YoY generation capacity, renewable capacity growth, it's about 20%, 5.7 GW going to 6.8 GW with the generation -- RE generation growth is about 11%. And typically, the newer projects are coming even better PLF, I'm assuming. So of course, there could be some scheduling issue. Some projects have happened at the end of the quarter, but the number seems very different. So I was wondering, is there some maintenance-related loss or something else which is causing? So even if I had 69 MU of curtailment, the number is only 13% growth YoY?
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Right. Yes, I'll come to that. If you see the generation for us in solar generation in general is the PLF, what we are seeing in Quarter 1, about 22%, Quarter 2, but Quarter 3, as I said, 26% and Quarter 4, 28%. This is the annualized 25% breakup QoQ, which you can see the past data also, you will see the similar trend. So rather than going for a short-term Quarter 1 PLF, I think we have to wait for some longer time and wait for second half is significantly higher.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Also just to add that some capacity we've added very recently, which is also stabilizing, which is bringing it slightly lower from the average perspective. I just wanted to add.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
The next question is from Rajesh Majumdar from 360 ONE Capital.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
So sir, I was wondering on this Maruti Clean and Power, what is the logic of acquiring a subcritical capacity like this, except for the fact that the project is cheap. What are the long-term plans on this, if any? And how does it fit into our overall scheme of things?
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
See, yes, basically, the objective is, again, as I told you, the opportunity to improve upon on and to take advantage of the running asset. See, once the asset is ready, it is close to the coal mine. The opportunity of the upside of a small capacity, 60-odd MW capacity, which is open also either to go for a PPA or to take advantage of the merchant taking care of the evening, this thing. So it is overall, when we say the cost of acquisition, the opportunities lying, the tariffs which we are recognizing, it's a mix of many things. In addition to that, the team has done the technical due diligence. And after that, there is an option of utilizing part of the existing plant's resources and investing and maybe doubling the capacity or even more in the same plant, which is very, very close to the coal mines is also an opportunity to take advantage of. So it's a mix of a few factors, which makes this asset extremely attractive for us.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
So we may see brownfield announcements on this in the future is what you're trying to say?
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Yes, yes, there is an opportunity. And, it is a very, very value-accretive EV/EBITDA, if you see, at what multiple I'm acquiring this and what is prevailing in the industry as a norm. So all those factors also were considered. This is a very attractive acquisition, the price at which we have acquired. We are in the process.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Okay. And sir, my other question is on the debt. So if you look at first of all, what is the gross debt figure as of June 30? You've given the net debt figure, it is about ₹ 55,000 Cr. What is the gross debt figure? JSW Energy Limited July 22, 2026 Page 15 of 16
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Yes, it's about ₹ 74,000 crores is the gross debt. And we have about close to ₹ 12,900 crores of cash, yes.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
₹ 74,000 crores and ₹ 12,900 crores in investment. So net debt is ₹ 55,000 crores.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Yes.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
And is there any balance of the cash raised during the quarter left to come in, in terms of the June '30 number or it's already been factored in the entire, whatever, ₹ 10,150 crores
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Both the QIP and the JSW Steel liquidation, which we did, I think those are already in. We have about close to ₹ 1,900 crores of the preferential capital from the promoters that can come in because that can come in within 18 months what we did. So that can come in any time.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
That is the last date. End date is June '27 if the requirement is earlier, but this is there. That is yet to come, ₹ 1,875 crores.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Right. And if we look at it, you talked about ₹ 20,000 crores capex for the year. So essentially, that means we are looking at the gross debt increasing by another ₹ 6,000 crores to ₹ 7,000 crores. Is that the right assumption?
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
No, I think how we look at is that, see, for example, we have already done about this ₹ 7,000 crores of fundraise, and we'll have an operating cash flow also coming in, so which can give us close to, put together, about ₹ 12,000-₹ 12,500 crores odd numbers. The balance is what we can kind of look at the balance required between whatever ₹ 20,000 crores minus ₹ 12,500 crores is what the incremental this one could be.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
And next year also, we plan to add about 3 GW or similar?
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Yes, it will be in the same range. It will be in this range only.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
The next question is from Atul Tiwari from JPMorgan.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
So my question is on the profitability at the PBT or PAT level, which has been quite suppressed over the past few quarters, obviously because of increase in depreciation and finance costs. And obviously, in your portfolio mix, there are a number of projects which are very mature now, right, operating for many years on thermal side. So my question is, will this situation persist over the next few quarters or are we likely to see improvement in the profitability at the PBT or PAT level? Because your ROEs have been suppressed quite a bit after factoring depreciation.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
I think there are two things here. So one is like if you look at the capacity additions that we have been doing, these are mostly in the RE sector, right? Now, last year, we did about close to 2.3 GW, this year, we have said 3 GW. Now, the assets we started developing 2–3 years ago are the ones that are getting commissioned today. Initially, the interest cost charged to the P&L is relatively higher because there is a JSW Energy Limited July 22, 2026 Page 16 of 16 moratorium during the construction period. Once commissioning starts, the interest expense recognized in the P&L remains higher in the initial years. However, as the asset stabilizes over a period of about 4–5 years, we see a better translation of EBITDA into PBT and PAT. This is generally how the economics of such projects work across the industry as well.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
The next question is from Dishant Jain from Quasar Capital.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
So just a very basic question. Since and correct me if I'm wrong, but I heard that we continue to receive the fixed charges even if we have the lower PLF on the thermal side. So when do we account it? And when do we actually receive the fixed charges from the customers?
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
If you look at Mahanadi, the plant availability entitlement is considered over the entire year and is around 85%. Once the required availability level is achieved, the corresponding income can be recognized. However, while the revenue is recognized in the current period, the actual cash collection is expected over the next two to three quarters
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
So collection you will receive in the next 2 to 3 Quarters. And when do you account it, sir?
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
The accounting happens now in this quarter. For example, in this case, when we said to the extent of whatever because we are kind of saying that 85% of the minimum availability will anyway reach. And to the extent of the fixed charges, we are eligible to get, that is only accounted in this Quarter.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
That was the last question. I would now like to hand the conference back to the management team for closing comments.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Yes. Thank you all of you. Thank you very much and for being with us today and having the interaction. And also, in case there are any further questions that come up, or if you feel any of your questions have not been answered and would like to know more, please connect with our IR team, and we will be happy to take those and respond to them. Thank you very much.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Good day. Thank you.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Thank you.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.
Thank you very much. On behalf of JM Financial Institutional Securities, that concludes the conference. Thank you for joining us. Ladies and gentlemen, you may now disconnect your lines.
No answer was attributed to this question in the transcript.